The Trump administration’s try at “humiliating and penalising” Pakistan for allegedly failing to take decisive motion towards militant teams hostile to the US is unlikely to work, former American ambassador to Pakistan Richard Olson has argued, warning that Islamabad has higher leverage over Washington than is often perceived.
“Pakistan, like most nations, reacts very badly to public makes an attempt to pressure its hand. It’s more likely to reply by displaying the way it can really undercut our place in Afghanistan,” wrote Olson, who additionally served because the US particular consultant for Afghanistan and Pakistan, in an op-ed published in the The New York Times on Tuesday.
In his article titled ‘How To not Interact With Pakistan’, the previous envoy assessed the influence of the US determination to withhold security assistance to Pakistan.
“For the previous sixteen years our army efforts in landlocked Afghanistan have been depending on transit via and particularly overflight of Pakistani territory,” he stated. “Absent an implausible comparable association with Iran, different choices will not be good.”
“With out Pakistani cooperation, our [US] military in Afghanistan dangers turning into a beached whale,” he argued.
Giving historic background of Pakistan’s coverage selections, Olson famous that Pakistan’s safety considerations emanating from its notion of India as an “existential menace” had led to its adoption of uneven army options, such because the alleged use of proxies.
Conceding that the US too had supported a few of these proxies within the Nineteen Eighties towards the Soviets in Afghanistan, the diplomat stated Pakistan “by no means had a simple choice of breaking with Afghan militants”.
Olson stated throughout his time as ambassador he had persistently tried to persuade Pakistan that it had to decide on between its relationship with the US and that with the Taliban, however he “by no means obtained any buy”.
“The generals knew that so long as the USA maintained a military in Afghanistan, it was extra depending on Pakistan than Pakistan was on it.”
The tough fact, Olson stated, was that American leverage over each Islamabad and Rawalpindi (a reference to the civilian authorities and the army, respectively) has been declining.
“And as United States assist ranges have diminished … help from the Chinese language has elevated,” he wrote, noting China’s funding of $sixty two billion in Pakistani infrastructure beneath the China-Pakistan Financial Hall (CPEC).
“Its [CPEC’s] magnitude and its transformation of elements of Pakistan dwarf something america has ever undertaken,” the previous US envoy wrote.
“Thus, the Trump administration’s try at humiliating and penalising Pakistan is unlikely to work.”
The previous ambassador stated a extra logical plan of action for the US is to carry personal talks with Pakistan to discourage its alleged help for militant teams. A diplomatic initiative ought to be began to convey an finish to the Afghan battle by opening talks with the Taliban, he prompt.
“The trail of the tweet and extremely public assist cuts isn’t a way that may engender success,” he stated, in a reference to Trump’s tweet through which he alleged that Pakistan has given the US “nothing however lies and deceit”.
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
Sign me up for the newsletter!
The content is the property of the Roznama Urdu and without permission of the publisher will be considered copyright infringement..