A Supreme Courtroom bench on Thursday referred to the chief justice a petition filed by a sitting decide of the Islamabad Excessive Courtroom (IHC) in search of the structure of a bigger bench to listen to a reference towards him. The decide has additionally sought an open trial within the case, which is presently being heard by the Supreme Judicial Council (SJC).
A two-decide bench comprising Justice Sheikh Azmat Saeed and Justice Qazi Faez Isa had taken up the petition. It was filed by Justice Shaukat Aziz Siddiqui, who has been accused of professional misconduct.
Whereas issuing notices to the federation and the lawyer common, the bench referred the matter to Chief Justice Mian Saqib Nisar for the formation of a bigger bench.
The SJC, which tries sitting judges, has all the time held closed-door proceedings since its institution in 1962.
The council was established beneath Article 209 of the Structure to inquire into allegations leveled towards judges of the apex and excessive courts over misconduct or an incapability to carry out their duties for causes of psychological or bodily incapacity.
The SJC had issued Justice Siddiqui a present-trigger discover on Feb 15 and had on Oct 10 determined to document proof towards the decide within the first week of November.
The grievance towards Justice Siddiqui, regarding allegations of professional misconduct, was initially moved by a retired worker of the Capital Improvement Authority (CDA), who had raised situation over the refurbishment of the senior decide’s official residence past entitlement.
In his petition earlier than the Supreme Courtroom, Justice Siddiqui stated he had the elemental proper to insist that an inquiry into his conduct be held publicly. Justice Siddiqui additionally requested the apex courtroom to droop the proceedings of the SJC.
On Thursday, Justice Saeed noticed that the bench couldn’t instantly order the suspension of the proceedings of the council. The petitioner’s (Justice Siddiqui) counsel argued that the principles of SJC violate the Structure. He contended that the Structure doesn’t allow the council to draft legal guidelines, however solely a code of conduct.
The counsel recalled that an inquiry had been initiated up to now towards a decide over allegations of scolding a deputy superintendent of police. When the decide resigned, he stated, the media labelled it to be a resignation ensuing from corruption.
“The entire fact will come earlier than the general public if the trial is held in an open courtroom,” he stated.
Justice Isa noticed that whereas half-truths are all the time damaging and harmful, hearings of the council are held in-digital camera to guard the judges’ conduct.
At this, the lawyer responded that Justice Siddiqui doesn’t want such safety.
An identical request to order an open trial relatively than conducting SJC proceedings in personal was raised earlier than the council on Might 18, however was overturned.
Former chief justice of Pakistan (CJP) Anwar Zaheer Jamali had in October final yr additionally dismissed a petition looking for the publicising of the variety of references filed towards superior courtroom judges. He had dominated that the SJC proceedings weren’t within the public area.
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
Sign me up for the newsletter!
The content is the property of the Roznama Urdu and without permission of the publisher will be considered copyright infringement..