ISLAMABAD: Chief Justice of Pakistan Mian Saqib Nisar Thursday dismissed the objection of registrar workplace raised on a petition difficult non-affirmation of elevation of Justice Mrs Erum Sajjad Gul of the Lahore Excessive Courtroom (LHC).
The chief justice whereas listening to the attraction in his chamber filed by Justice (R) Nasira Javed Iqbal on behalf of Mrs Erum Sajjad Gul overruled the objections raised by the registrar workplace and directed fixing of the petition earlier than a bench of the apex courtroom.
Final yr on October 14, Justice (R) Nasira Javed Iqbal had filed a petition within the Supreme Courtroom beneath Article 184(three) of the Structure via her counsel Shah Khawar difficult the order handed by the Judicial Fee of Pakistan, dated Might 5, 2017 by non-confirming the service of Justice Mrs Erum Sajjad Gul of the LHC. She had prayed the apex courtroom to put aside the impugned order of Might 04, 2017, handed by the Judicial Fee of Pakistan to the extent of non-affirmation of Erum Sajjad and ship the matter again to the respondent Judicial Fee for reconsidering her case and in addition for deciding the unanimous reference despatched to the Judicial Fee by the respondent parliamentary committee within the bigger curiosity of justice.
The registrar workplace of the Supreme Courtroom had raised objection on the petition and said that the affirmation of service of Erum Sajjad as decide of the LHC was a person matter, not a matter of public significance. The registrar workplace had additional said that the petition has not availed an alternate treatment out there in regulation and had returned the petition together with all unique copies.
Later, Justice (R) Nasira Javed Iqbal challenged the objections of the registrar workplace whereas submitting an attraction within the chamber of Chief Justice Mian Saqib Nisar.
In her petition, Nasira Javed had contended that after serving for one yr as judges of the LHC, the names of judges looking for affirmation have been positioned earlier than the JCP within the 2016. The stated judges included Justice Javaid Minhas, Justice Sardar Ahmed Naeem, Justice Gulzar Awan, Justice Erum Sajjad, Justice Raja Shahid Abbasi, Justice Sheram Sarwar Chaudhry, Justice Muhammad Sajid Mehmood Sethi and Justice Sardar Muhammad Sarfaraz Dogar.
The petitioner submitted that in its first assembly the JCP dropped the names of Justice Javaid Minhas and Justice Gulzar Awan and have been of the opinion that Justice Sardar Ahmed Naeem, Justice Erum Sajjad, Justice Sheram Sarwar Chaudhry and Justice Muhammad Sajid Mehmood Sethi be confirmed whereas the opposite two judges be given an extra extension of 1 yr.
The petitioner submitted that in the long run it was determined by the JCP that not one of the judges be confirmed they usually all be given an extra one yr extension. However after finishing two years of service, all these judges have been confirmed besides the only feminine decide Erum Sajjad, although she determined 10,000 instances which have been upheld by the Supreme Courtroom of Pakistan,” the petitioner had knowledgeable the apex courtroom. She submitted that based on the document stored by the LHC amongst the sitting judges of the LHC, Justice Erum had disposed of most instances in these two years. She was applauded for her onerous work by the chief justice and different senior judges of the LHC.
She additional contended that Justice Erum throughout these two years served as a single bench in addition to in several division benches of the LHC. Equally, she authored extremely delicate instances of terrorism, NAB and so on. which have been upheld by the Supreme Courtroom of Pakistan, the petitioner submitted.
The petitioner submitted that non-affirmation of Justice Erum is a transparent violation of Article 25 learn with different provisions of the Structure and can also be a serious setback to the ladies of Pakistan, discouraging feminine Legal professionals by sending them a message that females will not be applicable to be Excessive Courtroom Judges.
The petitioner had contended that although Justice Erum was an upright, trustworthy, clever, hardworking and succesful decide however she was not confirmed as a excessive courtroom decide. The petitioner had pleaded that the difficulty to be decided within the constitutional petition is a query of public significance as contemplated underneath Article 184(three) of the Structure.
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
Sign me up for the newsletter!
The content is the property of the Roznama Urdu and without permission of the publisher will be considered copyright infringement..